Burying the STC Debate

Lee's been gnawing on this particular bone ever since he was appointed to MacLean's old position, and I'm surprised he's still able to find some meat on it. Let me try to put it back into the ground where it belongs.

Yes, STC loses money on almost every route they run. But to say this is a huge burden on the taxpayer is a complete falsehood. Using the CTF's own statistics (page 15), let's consider a $35 million loss to STC since 1999. That works out to a grand total of $4.4 million per year, or an average of $4.40 per person per year for Saskatchewan residents. A little more than a penny per day per person to keep STC running. People drop that much change in the 7-11 parking lot.

Of course, we know the Sask Party wants to privatize STC. Fortunately, they can't risk turfing it and alienating their rural base. They're going to have to do enough damage control over school and hospital closures alone, let alone highways and infrastructure, that this is a front they won't want to fight on. I know people in rural Saskatchewan who live in one centre and are forced to bank and do shopping in another. They would not be able to do this without the support of STC. And while one could argue that they ought not to live in these communities, what does that say toward the idea of rural development and sustainability? Privitization will result in the lowest standards for everyone -- and that means reducing service to the three profitable routes of Saskatoon to Regina, Saskatoon to Prince Albert, and Regina to Moose Jaw, and sacrificing the mobility of our rural residents.

The icing on the cake is Harding's assertion that a poll showed 71% support for the privitization of STC. While this is stated in the document, it's important to emphasize that CTF supporters were the only group polled. Further, the sample size was omitted -- probably to hide the size of their base of support in Saskatchewan. Using their own bluster of 64,000 supporters nationwide -- about one fifth of one percent of Canadians -- and with the assumption that this percentage will hold as an average across Canada, we can posit a sample size of roughly 2100 people polled.

This is how the CTF bravely goes to bat for Saskatchewan people -- by polling people who would donate to their organization without the lure of tax receipts, taking the recommendation of 1500 of them as a mandate for change, then lobbying the government to enact said change, all in an effort to save people one stinking penny a day.

Lee, it's time for you to shut up about this issue. The only thing that's overtaxed here is your imagination, and you ought to consult with other CTF officials about that.

Wolfman Brad Gets Results!

One day after I replied to Lee Harding's comment about WAM on my blog, the CTF magically has a post on the excessive legislative staff salaries. My hard-hitting comments finally drove some sense into those hypocrites. Thanks for doing the right thing for a change.

The CTF is still a bunch of weasels, but at least now they're weasels who bend to my will! Dance, puppets!

We Are Many

Lee Harding, former pastor and current Executive Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, has turned his pulpit of the toward the We Are Many festival.

“Why should our governments pay for free entertainment and activism?” asked Lee Harding, Saskatchewan Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. “Organizers should get money from private supporters and festival attendees instead of co-opting politicians who are all-too-eager to look green.”
...
“No government or crown should fund political activism,” says Harding. “If this event really attracted 50,000 people, then $6.25 is all each of them would need to pay to cover all expenses. Citizens should pay for whatever concerts, festivals, or activism they want, not governments.”
(CTF Press Release, December 17, 2007)

While Harding raises an interesting issue in the top paragraph, he certainly raises an ominous one in the bottom. Does he really mean governments should not fund public festivals like the Mid-Winter Blues Festival, the Saskatoon Fringe Festival, the Regina Fringe Festival, KonaFest, Moose Jaw's Prairie Arts Festival, the Yorkton Short Film and Video Festival, Queer City Cinema (that's probably a gimme, given his background), Swift Current's Windscape Kite Festival, Ness Creek, the Boreal Mixed Media Jam, the Connect Festival (probably another gimme), the SaskTel Jazz Festival, Mosaic, the Regina Folk Festival, Moose Jaw's Motif Cultural Festival, Saskatoon's FolkFest, or the John Arcand Fiddle Festival?

This is far from an exhaustive list, but you get the idea. All of these events receive some sort of funding through municipal, provincial, or federal governments. Festivals provide people with entertainment, artists with publicity, communities with tourism, and cultures with exposure. It's one thing to say government shouldn't support political activism -- although the argument that WAM is political activism is tenuous -- but it's something else entirely to say they should pull out of funding festivals altogether. But given that these festivals are all filled with drug users, fornicators, and godless homos, I'm not surprised he has that opinion.

This is Lee's second news release attacking Saskatchewan's arts industry -- you may remember his tirade against the film industry two weeks ago. By the way, Lee, I'm still waiting for a piece on the new salaries for the Sask Party's legislative staff. Why don't you get your non-partisan ass on that?